|
PART 2 (Cont. from last issue)
By Steve Pierce
Horsepower depended upon the year of manufacture and the brand of snowmobile offering the motor. Generally, the 372 developed 14 HP in 1966, 17 HP in 1976 and 21 HP in 1968.
By the late 1960's, manufacturers offering the big JLO single read like a list of who's who in snowmobiles - Arctic Cat, Fox Trac, Herters, Homelite, Hustler, Jetstar, Larson, Moto Ski, Polaris, Scorpion. Ski Daddler and Ski Whiz. OMC jumped on the band-with the Evinrude Bobcat and Johnson Challenger.
In 1969, the L380L entered the scene, retaining the same bore and stroke and the 372cc displacement. The I.D. tag remained in the same location, giving the type L380L, displacement 372cc and the motor number still beginning with 372. A typical motor number would be 372303650. The 1969 L380L turned 23.5 stock horsepower at 5,000 rpm and by 1970 gained a horse and 500 rpm.
The Tillotson HD remained the recommended and favored carb. although Jetstar of Wahoo, Nebraska, employed the Japanese Keihin 407 and the Walbro WD1, as did a smattering of others.
Due to success in racing and subsequent popularity, mod kits soon became available. Aftermarket companies provided racing pistons and tuned exhaust. Third bearing kits for the PTO end of the crankshaft could be purchased for $21.50, entire short block assemblies for $150.
Champion made a racing spark plug, the K54R, to replace the standard K9 for hard running.
The L380L appeared physically about the same as the L372L and suffered from some of the same maladies. A heat shroud was added to the intake side to prevent vapor lock, a condition in which the carb. gets so hot the atomizing fuel mix boils and vaporizes, starving the engine for fuel. Seasoned warm weather riders found that packing snow onto the carb would speed them on their way.
The JLO rewind still left a whole lot to be desired. Many operators stood in disgust as the spring-loaded cups on the pawls slipped out of place and the cable would not retract. Never, ever spray lubricant on the dogs and friction plate or the starter would not engage at all. The cable would retract very slowly in cold weather. If you were fortunate enough to start the engine, the vibration would usually draw the cable back in. Woe be to the unfortunate one attempting to remove the slotted retaining screws with a screwdriver out on the trail. Still, this newer round friction plate setup was far superior to the old 1966 style.
Exhaust studs increased in diameter to alleviate the earlier problems of stripping and breakage.
The L380L still used the flat six bolt head, but with higher compression. Pistons used two thinner rings, as did the later L372L.
Electric start was available on the 380 and later 372.
The ignition system advanced from magneto to energy transfer, the obvious difference being the external coil mounted near the carb. Timing advance for easier stalling was used also on the later 372. An updated lighting coil generated 13 volts and 75 watts with a noticeably brighter headlight the result.
JLO offered an even larger 396cc single in 1970, but the days of the big one lunger were fast coming to an end.
Strangely, the 372 JLO played a major role in its own demise. German engineering had long been heralded as the finest in the world. Around 1967, Polaris Industries provided Fuji heavy industries of Japan with a 372 as a model for an improved version. It didn't take Japanese technology long to catch and surpass the power and performance level of the Germans.
The 372 JO ironically fell victim to itself and the ever rising industry standards it helped to establish.
Reprinted with permission. More of Steve's work can be found in Iron Dogs Tracks the official newsletter of the Antique Snowmobile Club Of America. |